Australian family law, guided by the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (“Act”), addresses complex issues related to high conflict parenting orders. These orders determine child custody, visitation, and parental responsibilities. In recent years, several significant cases and legislative changes have shaped the court’s approach in managing these disputes, particularly where parental conflict is high.
The Role of Parenting Orders
Parenting orders are decisions made by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (“Court”), specifying the arrangements for a child’s care, including who the child will live with and how much time they will spend with each parent. The primary consideration in these decisions is the “best interests of the child,” as mandated by section 60CA of the Act. The Act prioritises two factors: the benefit of the child maintaining a meaningful relationship with both parents and the need to protect the child from harm, including exposure to family violence.
Challenges in High-Conflict Cases
High-conflict cases often involve allegations of violence, abuse, or severe parental alienation, creating a challenging environment for courts to navigate. A landmark case, M v M (1988) 166 CLR 69, highlighted the Court’s duty to intervene in such situations to protect the child’s welfare, even if it means limiting a parent’s contact with the child. This decision reinforced the principle that child safety is paramount, even at the cost of reducing contact with one parent.
Legislative Changes and Their Impact
The Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Act 2006 promoted shared parental involvement but also introduced complexities in high-conflict situations. In Goode v Goode (2006) FLC 93-286, the Full Court clarified that shared parental responsibility does not imply equal time with both parents, particularly when conflict or risk of harm is present.
Further changes came with the Family Law Amendment (Family Violence and Other Measures) Act 2011, which emphasised protecting children from harm, responding to concerns that the 2006 reforms may have exposed children to unsafe situations. This amendment aligned with the principles established in M v M (1988), stressing child safety over shared time.
Future Directions
The Family Law Amendment Bill 2023 proposes further reforms to prioritise child safety and well-being. It suggests clearer guidelines for judges to assess potential risks in high-conflict situations and incorporates more therapeutic, non-adversarial approaches to resolving disputes. These proposed changes aim to ensure that the child’s best interests remain the focus of all family law proceedings.
Conclusion
The approach to parenting orders in high-conflict cases under Australian family law has significantly evolved. The Court continues to prioritise child safety over shared parenting time, reflecting a commitment to safeguarding children’s welfare in all circumstances. Future reforms are likely to enhance this focus, ensuring that family law proceedings better protect the most vulnerable.
If you require advice regarding a family law matter, contact us here.
